America should look to the Caribbean for crypto regulation

The crypto market has recently witnessed a substantial surge, reflecting a heightened interest in the potential of digital assets. The recent approval of spot bitcoin ETFs by the US Securities and Exchange Commission stands as a landmark event, signaling a step toward regulatory acceptance. 

But despite this, the crypto landscape continues to face increased regulatory scrutiny. Companies are finding themselves at a crossroads — particularly in the US.

Operating in a regulation-by-enforcement environment is akin to building a house without a blueprint — it’s chaotic, unpredictable and increases the likelihood of failure. 

To foster a healthy and thriving crypto industry, the US should take cues from its more nimble neighbours in the Caribbean. More open, communicative and collaborative regulatory strategies provide a more solid foundation on which crypto businesses can thrive.

The crypto regulatory landscape in the US

The lack of crypto-specific legislation or clear guidelines from regulators on how existing laws apply to crypto has left US crypto companies in a perpetual state of uncertainty.

Only four of the world’s top centralized crypto exchanges are reportedly regulated by the SEC. Following ether’s transition to a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, the SEC’s recent probe into Ethereum Foundation, a non-profit supporting the Ethereum ecosystem, is yet another example of confusing US crypto policy. 

Read more from our opinion section: No, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority isn’t now pro-crypto ETF

The US’ regulation-by-enforcement approach — characterized by an emphasis on execution over collaboration — makes operating in the country akin to playing a game without knowing the rules. It’s a frustrating experience for businesses trying to navigate the crypto space. 

Instead of providing a stable and predictable environment, the current US regulatory stance often feels reactive, leaving companies to second-guess their strategies, stifling innovation in what’s become a booming, global economic market. And given the current political climate in the US and the upcoming election, it is unlikely we will see bipartisan support for any crypto-specific legislation until 2025 at the earliest. 

The appeal of smaller, nimbler jurisdictions

Many US crypto companies have begun exploring other jurisdictions for their non-US business, alternatives that embrace innovation while fostering a cooperative regulatory atmosphere. This is evidenced by the fact that 79% of the top centralized exchanges registered with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) are also regulated in at least one other country.

Regions with a quicker-moving approach to crypto regulation have taken the opportunity to lead internationally on the innovation of crypto regulation. For example, Gibraltar implemented the DLT Provider Regime back in 2018 and became the first jurisdiction to supervise crypto service providers with a principles-based regulatory framework. 

In addition, the allure of the Caribbean as a burgeoning crypto hub is hard to ignore. Several countries in the region are taking positive steps by reflecting on, learning from and working to adapt their existing crypto legislation. 

On Feb. 13, the Ministry of Financial Services in the Cayman Islands launched a consultation on amendments to the Virtual Asset (Service Provider) Act. The changes build on its existing registration regime focused on anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing, and cybersecurity. They also introduced a licensing regime for virtual asset trading platforms and custodians.

On Feb. 29, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) launched a consultation on its proposed Digital Asset Business (Custody of Client Assets) Rules 2024, which will enhance its current regulatory regime for digital assets, providing further clarity on the BMA’s expectations of any digital asset business holding client assets.

In 2023, the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) held a consultation with key crypto stakeholders on its proposed Digital Asset and Registered Exchanges Bill. We anticipate the SCB’s revised regulatory regime will soon come into force. In addition to strengthening the existing regime, the bill proposes to bring more novel services such as staking under the regulatory remit, and includes specific provisions for stablecoin issuances.

By embracing the potential economic benefits of crypto innovation, countries such as the Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands are actively courting industry leaders, offering a regulatory framework that balances regulatory objectives with the freedom to innovate. 

The way forward for crypto regulation

2024 is set to be a huge year for the crypto industry. Progressive regulatory regimes allow innovative firms to flourish, while regressive ones punish good actors and create conditions for bad actors to capture market share. 

The migration of crypto firms to these more adaptive jurisdictions signifies a broader shift in the industry’s landscape. While the US is home to many key players in the crypto space, firms are seeking out jurisdictions that not only understand the technology underpinning crypto, but also actively engage in collaborative efforts to shape effective regulations.

As the industry navigates these changes, it’s clear that jurisdictions willing to embrace innovation while working hand-in-hand with industry leaders will be at the forefront of shaping the future of crypto regulation. 

Don’t miss the next big story – join our  free daily newsletter .