Kraken Demands Jury Trial in SEC Lawsuit Over Digital Assets
The SEC identified 11 tokens, including ADA, ALGO, ATOM, FIL, and SOL, as unregistered securities, allegedly offered and sold on Kraken's platform without proper registration.
Kraken, a prominent U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange, has formally requested a jury trial in the legal battle initiated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), according to a recent court filing.
The filing comes after a California judge ruled last month that the SEC’s lawsuit against Kraken would proceed to trial. This lawsuit mirrors similar cases brought by the SEC against other major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, which have also been accused of violating federal securities laws by not registering as a broker, clearinghouse, or exchange.
The SEC initially filed the lawsuit in the Northern District of California last November, seeking to permanently block Kraken from violating securities laws. The regulator demanded disgorgement of the exchange’s “ill-gotten gains” along with other civil penalties. Specifically, the SEC identified 11 tokens, including ADA, ALGO, ATOM, FIL, and SOL, as unregistered securities, allegedly offered and sold on Kraken’s platform without proper registration.
In its Thursday filing, Kraken addressed all of the SEC’s allegations and put out eighteen legal defenses, all of which were strongly denied being illegal.
The exchange’s claim is based on its interpretation of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, which states that neither legislation explicitly encompasses digital assets. Kraken claimed that it was never required to register with the SEC since it does not operate as a broker-dealer, exchange, or clearinghouse under the terms of those acts.
Kraken’s legal defense argues that digital assets are not “investment contracts” and therefore don’t fall under the SEC’s jurisdiction. The company claims these tokens lack the characteristics of traditional securities like stocks or bonds, accusing the SEC of overreaching by applying outdated laws to the evolving crypto market.
Kraken accused the SEC of violating due process and unfairly targeting it for exercising First Amendment rights. The exchange argued that its services, like margin trading and OTC trading, don’t make it a securities exchange, clearinghouse, or broker-dealer.
As Kraken gears up for a jury trial, the outcome of this case could have significant implications for the broader cryptocurrency industry.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Overview of important developments on the evening of October 30
Privacy blockchain project Nillion raises $25 million
Payment startup Felix partners with Zero Hash to improve international remittances
Morph is now available on Ethereum mainnet