Congress Challenges SEC’s Authority on Digital Asset Security Regulation
- The crypto sector pushes for clear regulations to avoid confusion and encourage diversification.
- Some lawmakers argue the SEC is exceeding its authority over digital custody rules.
- Conversations rise on whether the SEC’s focus on monitoring is hindering innovation in crypto.
The phrase “digital asset security” used by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has raised concerns among lawmakers. In a recent hearing, Rep. Ritchie Torres questioned whether the SEC created the acronym to expand its enforcement control. Torres pointed out that the phrase “digital asset protection” does not appear in any law or ordinance. This has sparked arguments about whether the SEC is overstepping its authority in the industry. Now, many are asking if the SEC’s actions are justified.
Crypto Industry Seeks Regulatory Transparency
Leaders in the digital asset space are pushing for clearer guidelines from the SEC. They argue the current focus on enforcement creates confusion for digital asset firms. The lack of clear rules makes it harder for businesses to innovate and grow in the United States.
Rep. Tom Emmer has also faulted the SEC for its decisions. He claimed the agency is targeting companies trying to comply with the rules. He accused the SEC of leading a “rogue campaign” against the crypto industry. Emmer said the SEC encourages firms to engage but later hits them with enforcement actions. Industry leaders believe clearer rules would support both innovation and legal compliance.
Political Divide on SEC’s Strategy
The SEC’s approach has caused a split in Congress. Some legislators support the SEC’s work, but others think the agency is going too far. Rep. Patrick McHenry , who leads the House Financial Services Committee, opposed the securities exchange’s Chair, Gary Gensler’s, methods. McHenry said the SEC is acting like a “rogue agency” and focusing too much on enforcement.
Read CRYPTONEWSLAND on google newsOn the other hand, many Democratic lawmakers back Gensler’s actions. They believe the SEC is protecting investors and keeping economies stable. The difference in views shows how complicated it is to govern the fast-changing digital property sector.
As the debate continues, regulators and industry officials are waiting to see how the future of digital investment regulation will develop.
disclaimer read moreCrypto News Land, also abbreviated as "CNL", is an independent media entity - we are not affiliated with any company in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. We aim to provide fresh and relevant content that will help build up the crypto space since we believe in its potential to impact the world for the better. All of our news sources are credible and accurate as we know it, although we do not make any warranty as to the validity of their statements as well as their motive behind it. While we make sure to double-check the veracity of information from our sources, we do not make any assurances as to the timeliness and completeness of any information in our website as provided by our sources. Moreover, we disclaim any information on our website as investment or financial advice. We encourage all visitors to do your own research and consult with an expert in the relevant subject before making any investment or trading decision.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Chainlink ‘god candle’ appears as LINK price soars 27% in 24 hours
South Korea's martial law is the first since 1980
British government: will "closely monitor" the situation in South Korea
CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju says he will delete his previous tweet asking for help from Musk